Topic
Supplementary information about electromagnetic hypersensitive persons
Start
01.09.2004
End
30.06.2005
Project Management
KATALYSE Institute for Applied Environmental Research
Objective
The
objective of this project was to compile further descriptive
information on electrosensitive persons from the point of view of
sociodemographic characteristics and other personality traits. This
information was to serve as a basis for recommendations for an
appropriate information and communication strategy with this group of
persons. It is part of BfS' precautionary strategy to improve the
communication with and information of this group who is particularly
affected by mobile telecommunications.
The study used quantitative and
qualitative methods to gain information on the innate character and
information requirements of this group of persons. On the basis of
these findings recommendations were developed for improving
communication with electrosensitive persons.
It
was not the objective of this study to comment on the existence or
the causes of electrosensitivity or to judge if the statements made
by the interviewed persons were true or false. This project rather
focuses on the subjective point of view, irrespective of the question
if EMF dangers or electrosensitivity are empirically detectable
phenomena or not.
Results
1. Methods and approach
This study considers such persons as
electrosensitive who see the origin of certain physical disorders
which can be described precisely and which have occurred more than
once in the existence of electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields
(EMF).
Two
surveys were performed, a quantitative survey focussing on
sociodemographic and psychometric data and a qualitative,
psychological survey. As a first step, the prevalence of the target
group among the total population was established with the help of a
representative telephone survey, which also served to gain further
information on electrosensitivity. 40 test persons were examined in
morphological depth interviews in order to discover how people deal
with the phenomenon of "electrosensitivity" on a psychological
basis. The results of these surveys together with an integration
concept developed for this project helped elaborate recommendations
for the communication with electrosensitive persons.
2. Demography and quantitative psychography
Prevalence: The quantitative
electrosensitivity study included telephone interviews with 2,406
people in the framework of a representative nationwide survey. With
the help of predetermined criteria according to the above cited
working definition, a quota of 6 % of electrosensitive persons was
determined among the total population of Germany. This value matches
with the values established by international research results and
estimations made by different stakeholders’ groups ranging from 1.5
% to 10 %.
The
persons questioned were not confronted with the term
"electrosensitive" until the end of the interview. In fact,
roughly half of the persons affected are familiar with this term.
Only a third of the persons interviewed who are aware of this term
described themselves as "electrosensitive".
With
respect to sociodemographic characteristics, the group of
electrosensitive people does not differ considerably from the total
population in their age, sex, the size of their households or the
distribution between East and West Germany. There are, however,
differences between electrosensitive people and the total population
with respect to their education and their regional distribution. The
quota of 26 % of persons with German A-levels qualification (Abitur)
shows that electrosensitive people have a higher education standard
than the average population (15 %). Furthermore, a regional
accumulation of electrosensitive people was found in the southwestern
part of Germany (34 % of the electrosensitive).
Roughly
half of the electrosensitive persons interviewed (49 %) reported
earlier health problems, which did not exist by the time of
the interview, while 51 % reported current health problems.
Among
all potential sources for these health problems mobile phones
were most frequently quoted (30 % of the persons surveyed), followed
by TV sets (22 %), radio alarm clocks (19 %) and mobile phone base
stations (17 %). The sources mentioned vary in their significance to
the persons affected, depending on the fact if their health problems
currently exist or not. While approximately 40 % of the persons still
suffering from health problems cite mobile phones or mobile base
stations as main source of influence, only 28 % of those without
current health problems quote the same source. At the same time, 25 %
of electrosensitive persons without current health problems mention
their radio alarm clocks as most significant source, while this is
hardly important (quota of 1 %) for electrosensitive persons
suffering from acute health problems.
Type
and intensity of the health problems vary depending on the source
of radiation. Radiation sources from more recent technologies are
considered to have relatively lower disturbing effects (high-voltage
pylons, e.g., are on average thought to have stronger effects than
mobile phones). The group of electrosensitive people does not
fundamentally restrict the use of electronic devices, which could be
a hint for a general aversion against technologies. The rate of
mobile phone owners determined in the surveys is even higher in the
group of electrosensitive people than in the average of the
population (87 % vs. 78 %), whereas the mobile phone use behaviour is
comparable in both groups.
A
successful communication with the target group depends on the status
of information and the informational behaviour of the
target group with respect to the subject of EMF/electrosensitivity.
17 % of the electrosensitive people feel uninformed about the health
effects of EMF, half of this group feels at least partly informed and
one third considers themselve to be fairly well or even very well
informed. Mass media such as newspapers/magazines and/or
television/radio are the most commonly used sources of information.
71 % (newspapers/magazines) and 68 % (television/radio) of the
persons interviewed have gathered information about electromagnetic
fields from these sources. The group of electrosensitive people does
not differ from the total population in their informational
behaviour. 63 % of the electrosensitive people have considered to
take precautionary measures or have actively taken such measures.
3. Results: qualitative psychography
40
test persons chosen among the 167 electrosensitive people identified
during the first phase of the survey were invited for detailed
interviews and were questioned on how they treated the phenomenon of
electrosensitivity psychologically.
Depth
interviews revealed in more detail the personal significance of
radiation in the context of the selected persons’ everyday lives.
The electrosensitive people questioned proved to be a heterogeneous
group. Electrosensitivity appears to be a subject which takes on many
different forms, and many of the people interviewed found themselves
time and again in an internal conflict relating to this phenomenon.
Only in rare cases were "symptoms" and "triggers" clearly
linked (i.e. always if..., then...) – which would be usual in
standardised surveys. The interviews do not portray
"electrosensitivity" as a fixed and isolated fact in the everyday
lives of the persons interviewed.
4. Recommendations for communication
With
respect to the communication requirements voiced by the
electrosensitive people questioned, two central factors were
identified which might help to improve the communication with this
target group: "relevance for their everyday lives" and
"confidence". On the basis of these suggestions, recommendations
have been elaborated for four levels of action in the communication
with electrosensitive people (individual, political, institutional,
communicational).
The final report is available
as PDF-file (1,080 kb) in German.
Conclusions
The
results of the quantitative and qualitative survey performed in the
framework of this project provide more detailed findings of persons
who see the origin of certain physical disorders in the existence of
electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields (EMF). According to the
working definition, this group is considered as electrosensitive
persons. The study also reveals, however, that only a small part of
this group declares themselves to be "electrosensitive". The
important factor is rather their handling and/or the significance of
"radiation" in the context of their everyday lives, irrespective
of terms and definitions.
The findings obtained are an important basis for improving the
communication with people who feel impaired. They also help to adapt
the way information is offered to the particular needs of this group
of people.
|